Kandasamy Suppan’s Review
Click below to listen to Suppan’s Audio Review
Kandasamy Suppan’s Review
Movie Story
Susi Ganesen did not plan a strong story in his mind. Vikram is a CBI officer and he rides big shots houses and ceases the money. But he takes the money and gives it to the poor.
Ashish Vidyarthi is the villain and he wants to kill Vikram. On the other track, there is an unknown personality with the name Kandasamy who helps the poor by distributing money.
Finally Prabu DIG of police finds that unknown Kandasamy and CBI Kandasamy both are the same.
So this movie did not convey a great message or did not even entertain me or my friends.
Bad points
This is not a super hero movie. so it sucks bad and disappoints and does not live up to the promise from the AD
New technology in photography used in whole movie. All the movie photography is showed like it was burnt. If you guys know what is hue and Saturation in photo editing, you will understand this. This is one of the top points Susi should have worked on.
Frames: The movie was shot nicely but edited with minimum 5 frames per second. Yes 5 Frames in 1 Second, so imagine the pain our eyes have to go through. And It was through out the whole movie.
Shreya and Voice: Sujithra gave the dubbing voice for Shreya which was totally not good.
Family: You cannot watch this film with your family. This movie certification should have been A just for showing irrelevant glamour scenes
Susi Ganesen: Shockingly and shamelessly, he has appeared in this movie. Did he really work as an assistant director with Mani Rathnam???? He is only best for taking films like Thiruttu Payale (A)
Cameraman Ekambaram: is a good cameraman because of the saturated photography style and editing, people will hate him. He should avoid these non sense camera tricks and stop shaking the camera when shooting the fight scenes.
Vadivelu: Came as a guest role player and did his job but was not enough
There are more mistakes and the movie is full of GOOFs only. Not worth watching. My rating is 2/10 and this is for creating the hype.
ur comments are great,at least i knew that,not every koolywood fan is blind.keep up the good work.hope those people in koolywood realise that
yeah.. i agree wit that>>
ur rigt, the film is a flop.
i like ur review,
keep it up!
Thanks for your comment
I heard the movie grossed very well due to the marketing strategy by blocking almost all theaters and money was made even before the news spread out. I can copare this to Baba film hype, however kandasamy was more entertaining and glamorous in many respects, I can compare to moonraker movie which essentially was boring but had a good phase/glamour. Ayans rating is 4.5
i am partially agree with you
completely agree with you, the over ambitious editing was definitely an eyesore, felt like Puking after sitting in the theatre for 5 minutes. The editor must understand the difference between creating a trailor/ teaser & editing a movie. 5 frames per second throughout the movie without giving any respite… the film makers somehow definitely wanted to punish the public. & i somehow feel all
Mr. Kalaipuli Dhanu does is sponsor a movie with not-so-good script spend a fortune on technology & advertising, completely fool the people with marketing strategy & somehow pull of successfully even with a horrible show. eg. Aalavandhan, Sakkarakatti, Kandhasamy.
My verdict for the movie “i am kandhasamy ya paarthu nondha samy”
Suppan,
Do u have any problem with Susi or VIkram, hope u went & watch the correct movie, its far better than we see in Tamil cinema, your jobless comment will create bad impressing for all the hard work they have to release the movie…..
Hope u have got a good sum for the bad comment about kathasamy..
If ur looking for a job pls let me know rather than criticizing other hard work
Dear viewers,
Movies are made for entertainment & kathasamy is also same.
Cast, Technology, action & entertainment is superb
Its his opinion.
Stop being such a jackass and criticize his work.
Kandasamy was just a over-hyped movie which just copied scripts used before except with a new concept.
Either way the film was a failure regardless its performance at box office.
I agree with suppan because i could not sit and watch the movie.What a crap!!!Susi Ganesan must have made like Vikram gifted by angels some supernatural stuff.if it was superhero or some kind of usage of advanced machinery like batman stuff like that.the movie was yellow in colour as it was shot in 5 frames.i better call this movie a yellow movie.they have used martial arts so susi ganesan could have created a concept like through martial arts vikram develops inner strength super abilities through meditation etc and saves the poor.If another movie like Thirutu Payale was taken means it would have been a blockbuster.I dont think they should have spent a lot.just could have made upto needed cost and movies like unnaipol oruvan is an example