Comments on: Naan Kadavul Suppan’s Review

By: kenny

kenny — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:24:47 +0000

as sais limit urself to commercial movies… and bala has never made a commercial movy… and all movy goers know tht balas movie deals with the truth that the world doesnt wanna see…

so as said before limit yourself to commercial movies… and in between you should sue the person who gave you this idea to review on good movies

By: Suppan

Suppan — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:40:12 +0000

So what?

I appreciated his movie because it is an ART movie but projected and advertised as Commercial movie. Same applies to AO.

But this can be no where near to ART movie… If some one says it is a best movie, they really do not have a sense for movies OR they are occasional movie watcher who have no idea about cinema industry.

By: Kenny

Kenny — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:54:39 +0000

u need to have a close look at ur review again… cos bala has won the national awards for best director!

please grow up… or limit urself to commercial movies

By: kenny

kenny — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:18:41 +0000

i cant believe u said naan avan illai part 2 was a enjoyable movie and naan kadavul was a waste of time! u should just review third grade movies and stop yourself from being embarrased!

By: Arun

Arun — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:05:23 +0000

Nan kadavul is perhaps the best made and definitely the most depressing tamil film ever. The uniqueness of story trumps over all other aspects. the other aspects are also decent. Definitely a classic

By: kuppan

kuppan — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:48 +0000

Also i saw the link you had posted where an aghori eating some dead body. frankly i wonder if there is any dislike on that aspect of their way of living(although i beleive that is not a true aghori as genuine followers dont let anybody near them let alone taking video pictures). My point being there is lot we should learn about Hinduism(sanathana dharmam). There could be worse and is nauseating unless and untill we dont understand why they do it. There are so many silly things we do in so called civilised world which is much more nauseating.

Why do i lecture so much about this? the title for that link was “Truth behind Bala’s Nan Kadavul”. I found that negative(may be its not) association if not distasteful. I can also show a handicapped beggars footage and say truth behind bala’s naan kadavul or shot of parent who did something to their kid because of what an astrologer told or how a nun tries to convert a helpless poor people etc…

As someone pointed out when you Critique keep it strictly with in a parameter and try not to show your personal beleifs that has no bearing to the movie as you are not an alter ego of bala to support that title.

thanks

By: kuppan

kuppan — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:21:52 +0000

Suppan,
The very first Scene in the movie(Shot of KASI with hindi bhajan song) clearly depicts the intention of the director, not to expect usual tamil movie. In the time where Using english or other languages for title here is a director who slaps on your face by starting movie with full fledged hindi bhajan song. If you have not got that hint well there is no way anyone can understand what the movie is about. Secondly when did you see a bala movie where your expectations were based on a hero or heroine? I am baffled that you mentioned you expected arya to be hero and pooja to be heroine. In all his movies his story is the hero. Unless critics can think out of box(unfortunately thats not happening) how can we expect that form b,c level audiences? By the way B class and C class Audiences did appreciate the beggars scenes which very few critics have time to talk about in their critique. Too bad we fail to see what director wants to say(may be its the only fault of director to have missed out on that.) Unless that happens all masala heroes who are happy making remake movies will rule the roost and Tamil cinema will go into sewage.
Whenever you see a bold movies like this, i dare say bold because if you have listened to the dialogues, its anti god, anti politics but only spiritual(spirituality doesnt need god,relegion or politicians) Director has wanted to transcend his audience to a different plane. You may say tamil audience is not ready for it yet. Well they will never be unless someone takes them to that level. People in Indian subcontinent would never have got freedom if not for few handful of men who wanted to live and die free. Ofcourse people hardly have any respect for them like wise i dont expect tamil audience to appreciate this movie.
They can happily see and appreciate Remakes of other movies with no substance and no orginality.

Thanks.

By: Suppan

Suppan — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:18:43 +0000

Thank you,

By: Annie

Annie — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:27:24 +0000

Hi Suppan,
I listened to your Nan Kadavul movie review. I watched this movie in the theatre thrice I couldnt get enough the first time. Now you must be thinking i am koo koo to watch a few times Listening to your review i seem to agree the part where Bala has apparently done hard work but failed to potray Arya as hero. Am sure Arya “the drop dead gorgeous” deserves more time in the 3 hours movie. Watching the movie I felt the main character was villian and that beggar maid. You were spot on and i couldnt diagree with you.
Keep up the good work
Cheers
Annie

By: cinevenkat

cinevenkat — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:53:08 +0000

Hi Suppan,

I just don’t want to comment anything about your review.

If you have time, please visit the following link for my review regarding the film “Naan Kadavul”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usNSQxng3hE

After watching my review, you might feel that there are also spectators who enjoy such films. To be frank, I saw a few youngsters giving standing ovation when the film ended.

Please leave your comments after watching my review.
I wish to say that I will visit your website frequently as I am also interested in this aspect (review of movies).

regards,

cine venkat